Investigation · California High-Speed Rail · Public Accountability
HIGH-SPEED FAIL
California promised a bullet train by 2028.
A decade later, not one passenger has ridden it.
$13.8 billion spent. 554+ change orders. $540M+ in flagged waste. Board members with industry conflicts. A full accountability investigation built from public records.
$13.8B
Spent to Date
$4.0B+
Over Budget
0
Passengers Carried
2039+
Earliest Completion
$0
Spent Since Page Loaded
at ~$4.65M/day ($53.8/sec)
Investigation Overview · Updated March 2026

In November 2008, 53% of California voters approved a bond to build a bullet train from San Francisco to Los Angeles by 2020, for $33 billion, with no taxpayer subsidy required. That train does not exist. It has never carried a passenger. The cost estimate is now $128 billion. The deadline is 2039, at best. The FBI has been asked to investigate. And the week a $537 million payment was quietly approved in a closed session, the legislature passed a law restricting what the project's own Inspector General can tell the public.

$13.8B
Spent · Zero Passengers
On a train that has never carried a single paying passenger in 18 years of construction.
$250M
Per Mile of Track
17× more expensive than Japan's original Shinkansen. Among the most expensive rail projects in recorded history.
$0
Private Investment Raised
Prop 1A promised private capital would close funding gaps. Seventeen years later, not a dollar has materialized.
The Promise vs. The Reality

Prop 1A, November 2008 — five specific commitments, measured against 2026 facts

✓ 2008 — Promised
✗ 2026 — Reality
Total Cost
$33 billion
Total Cost
$128 billion+
+288% · rising every year
Trains Running
By 2020
Trains Running
2039 at earliest
OIG calls it "increasingly unlikely" even then
Route
San Francisco → Los Angeles
Route
Central Valley only
Merced to Bakersfield · SF and LA not connected
Operating Subsidy
None required
Prop 1A, Section 2704.08 — explicit prohibition
Operating Subsidy
Cannot operate without one
FRA compliance review finding · 2025
Private Investment
Would close any gaps
Private Investment
$0 in 17 years
State now offering public guarantees to attract capital
All 12 promises, graded →
The Investigation

Eleven chapters built from public records, federal filings, FEC data, and California Secretary of State disclosures. Follow any thread — every page goes deeper.

Breaking Mar 2026
THE COVER-UP
A secrecy bill. A $537M secret vote. An FBI request. California dropped a winning lawsuit without explanation.
Read the latest →
Chapter 2
THE CONNECTIONS
A senator's husband held the winning contractor. The board member who runs the contractors' lobby voted on their payouts.
Follow the relationships →
Chapter 3
THE WATCHDOGS
Nine people approve every contract. All nine voted unanimously on the $537M secret payment. Not one recused.
Meet the board →
Chapter 4
FOLLOW THE MONEY
$13.8 billion across 8 spending categories. Every single one over budget. Not one exception in 10 years of construction.
Follow the money →
Chapter 5
WHO GOT PAID
The lowest-scoring bidder won the biggest contract. A Spanish corporation took $2.4B. Three IT vendors show patterns consistent with fraud.
See the contractors →
Chapter 6
THE BILL
$540M in spending that can't be explained. A PR firm billed twice with no output. IT vendors operating under four different names.
See the waste →
Chapter 7
THE RED FLAGS
Eight procurement red flags. A California law the IT vendor pattern may have violated. $540M potentially recoverable.
See the flags →
Chapter 8
BROKEN PROMISES
Twelve specific commitments made to voters in 2008. Nine outright failures. Every promise about cost, timeline, or private money: broken.
See the scorecard →
Chapter 9
THE DRIFT
Cost revised seven times. Deadline slipped 19 years. It didn't happen all at once — one press conference at a time.
See the timeline →
Chapter 10
WHAT'S BUILT
80 miles of concrete guideway. No track installed. No trains ordered. 16% of Phase 1 complete. $13.8 billion to get here.
See the progress →
Chapter 11
THE VERDICT
Japan: $14M/mile. China: $40M/mile. California: $250M/mile — and nothing running. The global comparison is the final word.
See global comparison →
Key Findings

Nine findings from our public records investigation — each documented, sourced, and clickable for the full story.

Chapter 2 →
THE CONNECTIONS
A senator's husband held the winning contractor. A board member runs the industry lobby. The relationships were in place before the first contract was awarded.
Follow the relationships →